For the time being, however, stronger GDP growth would have a rather milder impact on the Bank's communication because of the unknown strength of wage dynamics with respect to rising productivity and the unknown composition of productivity growth. The latter may change the interpretation of disinflationary pressures induced by a stronger crown. I am thinking in particular of
improved industrial sentiment, which - if it led to higher growth in industrial activity - would dampen some of the disinflationary pressures from the koruna. In this case, the latter would also reflect better real industrial fundamentals. However, this scenario is undermined by the weaker purchasing managers' index in manufacturing. Overall, however, sentiment indicators do not point to a decline in industrial production, also thanks to the better level of German export expectations (see lower charts). However, the weaker Czech PMI is a reminder of the continued negative role of demand weakening industrial prospects with negative implications for investment (see link above).
The CNB's communication will later be influenced by the new government's economic plans, from two perspectives - how the government's actions on administered prices will dampen inflationary dynamics and how fiscal policy will in turn intensify inflationary pressures in the economy, or the government's borrowing needs, which may affect the risk premium and the exchange rate of the koruna. However, the CNB will react only to the specific formulation of measures rather than to the programme statement itself.
The contradictory implications of the government's statement for the CNB are reflected in the following:
1️⃣ The effects of the government's actions on inflation and price expectations, both in the area of energy and administered prices:
- E.g. consumer-paid RES cancellation: in October 2022, the temporary RES waiver had a consumer price impact of 0.4% points),
- the return of the 75% discount on student and senior fares: in 2022, the reduction of the discount to 50% resulted in savings of just under CZK 2 billion and the additional 25% discount effectively represents a 50% price reduction, which, given the weight of students and pensioners in the transport segment in the CPI basket of around one fifth, could have an impact of around -0.1% points )
- lower VAT (e.g. on prescribed medicines and catering)
However, in addition to the direct disinflationary effect on prices, there will also be an income effect through higher household disposable income. In the medium term, structural reforms, e.g. acceleration of the construction procedure with the potential for a more favourable supply side on the property market) can also be included among the disinflationary factors.
2️⃣ How new fiscal policy will affect inflation through:
- Public sector wage growth (e.g. 50k starting salaries in the police would be about 20% above the average after training, in education about 6% above the industry average),
- financial support for housing (down payments or subsidies on mortgage interest, although here the impact is limited to the age of 6 years of the child),
- tax credits for school fees,
- the introduction of EET/ERS 2.0 (in December 2016, prices in the catering sector rose by 3% m/m).
3️⃣ Failure to kick-start stronger economic growth may result in higher borrowing needs of the state, with possible negative effects on the risk premium and the exchange rate of the koruna (here, however, we are talking about the relative impact of, for example, vs. faster implementation of the German fiscal stimulus or France in fiscal trouble).
There may also be negative effects from additional fiscal challenges that undo important aspects of the pension reform, for which the Budget Council
has estimated (p. 29) positive impacts of up to 0.6% of GDP per year over a 10-year horizon and up to 2% over a 30-year horizon and beyond, or that will further narrow the room for manoeuvre of fiscal policy, which has increasingly been subject to the phenomenon of policy valorisation over the past decade (i.e. the growing share of valorisation schemes instead of political decision-making). In detail, this includes, for example, the capping of the retirement age, higher valorisation of pensions, but also of the salaries of soldiers and prison guards.
Although the future government refers to the balanced economy of 2016-2019, growth then was not driven by structural changes, but by demand stimulus and faster wage growth compared to productivity, which created a future, i.e. recent, inflationary breeding ground.