This text summarises four selected excerpts from my remarks shared during a panel discussion on FX reserves and central bank management on the occasion of the CNB Discussion Forum in Pilsen on 29 April 2025. The four nuggets: accounting loss vs. tangible costs of the CNB's monetary policy; the accumulation of CNB FX reserves and Czech bank liquidity; the dividend from the central bank to the Polish state budget; the long-horizon argument in FX reserve diversification clashing with proposals for a lower level of CNB FX reserves.
Main conclusions: 1) The CNB's loss is currently not just an accounting loss, but the solution to the higher costs of implementing monetary policy lies in increasing the economy's potential; 2) the high reserves are not only a remnant of the foreign exchange interventions of 2013-2017, but also reflect the conversion of EU funds on the CNB's balance sheet, which essentially redistributed the associated costs and profits in the economy; 3) the "dividends" to the Polish state budget have averaged 0.22% of GDP since 2011, which is illustratively in Czech real terms EUR 17.5 billion. CZK in 2024 prices.
For more discussion with charts below and more snippets see the entry on the CNB website.
1. The CNB's loss is currently not just an accounting loss, but the solution to the higher costs of implementing monetary policy lies in increasing the economy's potential
The CNB's performance is strongly influenced by the development of foreign exchange reserves, which affects the central bank's income statement through two channels. First, through the revaluation of foreign assets due to exchange rate movements. According to BR member Jan Kubíček (Plzeň, 29 April 2025), a CZK 1 appreciation of the koruna against the euro leads to a negative revaluation of the current (koruna) level of foreign exchange reserves by CZK 130 billion. This roughly corresponds to my estimate that a 1% revaluation of the exchange rate leads to a CZK 30 billion change in the koruna value of the CNB's reserves. Second, the income statement is affected (again in both directions) by income from foreign exchange reserves, i.e. interest on deposits, bonds, dividends on shares.
However, in recent years, especially since 2018, when inflationary developments forced the CNB to raise interest rates, its performance has been negatively affected by the cost of implementing monetary policy. The CNB does this by withdrawing bank liquidity at the cost of its two-week repo rate. This is no longer an accounting revaluation of the economic result, but a realised cost. In this case, the CNB has helped itself in the last two years by making its reserve requirement interest-free (from autumn 2023; similar to the ECB), which has been doubled to 4% from 2025 (without the ECB). This is partly compensated for by currency in circulation, i.e. cash, which, like the withdrawn liquidity on the CNB's liabilities side, is burdened with zero interest.
At present, the koruna does not appear to represent as significant a cost to the economic outcome in the medium term (given the fading convergence story) as the level of the neutral interest rate that the CNB will pay for withdrawn liquidity to the banking sector. And here again we return to the key problem of the Czech economy. The key question is how to increase the potential of the Czech economy. Its increase would then be reflected in softer inflationary pressures, a lower risk premium and, therefore, a lower CNB equilibrium interest rate at which the central bank withdraws excess liquidity from the banking sector.